Real Experiments versus Phet Simulations for Better High-School Students’ Understanding of Electrostatic Charging

  • Fadil Ajredini State University of Tetovo
  • Neset Izairi
  • Oliver Zajkov Ss. Cyril and Methodius University

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of computer simulations (virtual experiments) on one hand and real experiments on the other hand on the conceptual understanding of electrical charging. The investigated sample consists of students in the second year (10th grade) of three gymnasiums in Macedonia. There were two experimental groups and one control group. In one of the experimental groups, called Sim group, the instruction was realized by means of computer simulations. In the other experimental group, called Real group, the instruction was realized by means of real experiments. The difference between pre-test results and post-test results revel that the approaches used in experimental groups give more quality knowledge and skills than the one in the control group. The results in the Real group and Sim group are very similar. There are slight differences caused by the different features of the two approaches. Some differences occur based on the feature difference between real experiments and computer simulations.

References

Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Wieman, C. E. (2008a). A Study of Educational Simulations Part I - Engagement and Learning , Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19 (3), 397-419.
Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Wieman, C. E. (2008b). A Study of Educational Simulations Part II - Interface
Design , Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19 (4), 551-577.
Aufschnaiter von, C., Aufschnaiter von, S. (2007). University students’ activities, thinking and learning during laboratory work., Eur. J. Phys., 28, S51-S60.
Brekke M., Hogstad, H. (2010). New teaching methods - Using computer technology in physics, mathematics and computer science, International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 1, Issue 1, 17-24.
Chabay, R., Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. Am. J. Phys. 74 (4), 329-336.
Christian, W., Belloni, M. (2001). Physlets: Teaching Physics with Interactive Curricular Material, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Demirci, N.; Çirkonoglu, A. (2004). Determining Students’ Preconceptions/Misonceptions in Electricity and Magnetism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 1(2), 51-54.
Dilber, R., Duzgun, B. (2008). Effectiveness of analogy on students’ success and elimination of misconceptions. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 2 (3), 174-183.
Finkelstein, N.D. et al. (2004). Learning physics in context: a study of student learning about electricity and magnetism, Volume 27, Issue 10, January 2005, pages 1187-1209.
Fredlund, T., Airey, J., Linder, C. (2012). Exploring the role of physics representations: an illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction, Eur. J. Phys. 33. 657–666.
Galili. I. (1995). Mechanics background influences students’ conceptions in electromagnetism. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 17 (3), 371-387.
Honey, M., Hilton, M. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations, THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS, Washington, DC.
Mayer, R.E., Heiser, J., Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology. 93(1). 187-198.
McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and Researching PhET simulations for Teaching Quantum Mechanics, American Journal of Physics, 76:406.
PhET (2011) http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/balloons
Podolefsky, N. S., Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K. (2010). Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ., Res. 6, 020117.
Raduta, C. (n.d) General Students’ Misconceptions Related to Electricity and Magnetism, Retrieved on 20th April, 2013 from
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0503/0503132.pdf.
Randall, D. K. (2008). Student Workbook for Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach, Second Edition, Pearson & Addison Wesley.
Roth, W.M., Welzel, M. (2000). From activity to gestures and science language. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, April 28th – May 1st, 2000. Retrieved on 20th April 2013 from
http://education2.uvic.ca/Faculty/mroth/conferences/CONF2000/JRST110.pdf.
Stepans, J. (1996). Targetiing Students’ Science Misconceptions – Physical Science Concepts Using the Conceptual Change Model, Idea Factory, Inc. Riverview, FL.
Wikipedia, (2013), (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_induction)
Wikipedia (2009), (http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%84%D9%81:Electrostatic_induction-real.JPG)
Published
2017-02-28
How to Cite
AJREDINI, Fadil; IZAIRI, Neset; ZAJKOV, Oliver. Real Experiments versus Phet Simulations for Better High-School Students’ Understanding of Electrostatic Charging. European Journal of Physics Education, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 59-70, feb. 2017. ISSN 1309-7202. Available at: <http://eu-journal.org/index.php/EJPE/article/view/63>. Date accessed: 17 sep. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.v5i1.63.
Section
Articles