Investigation of STEM Competencies of Teacher Candidates

  • Nimet Remziye Ergül Bursa Uludağ University

Abstract

This research is a descriptive study aimed determining STEM competencies of science and mathematics preservice teachers. For this purpose, the science and mathematics preservice teachers were asked to design and conduct parachutes covering the topics of movement (free fall, air resistance and lift force) in the course of physics I. It was expected to consider variables such as the qualities to be used in parachute design and the geometry of the parachute surface. It is recommended to choose materials which are easily found in everyday life, such as rope, fabric, paper, nylon, etc., Parachutes were assessed according to their longest stay in the air and thus they were expected to have a result.
A total of 106 first grade science and mathematics preservice teachers studying at Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Education Department of Mathematics and Science Education were included in the study. When the obtained data were evaluated, three categories were determined and the ratio of the most desirable category was found to be 6.6%. All the results obtained are evaluated and the reasons for the low success are discussed.

References

Aşık, G., Doğança Küçük, Z., Helvacı, B. & Corlu, M. S. (2017). Integrated teaching project: a sustainable approach to teacher education, Turkish Journal of Education, 6(4), 200-215. DOI: 10.19128/turje.332731
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority [ACARA],(2017). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/rationale/
Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: a phenomenographic study. Int J Technol Des Educ ,26, 61–79 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., and Rumble, M. (2010). Draft White Paper 1: Defining 21stCentury Skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (ATCS). Retrieved from http://atc21s.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/11/1-Defining-21st-Century-Skills.pdf.
Breiner J. M., Harkness S.S., Johnson C. C., Koehler C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐ 12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
Bunn, G.; Dailey, D.; and Cotabish, A. (2015) "STEMteach: Preparing the Next Generation of Mathematics and Science Teachers," Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations: Vol.15. No.1. Available at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/jmsce_vamsc/vol15/iss1/12
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science, technology, engineering, mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/stem-complete.pdf
Christine V. McDonald. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International. 27(4), 530- 569.
Çepni, S. (Ed.)(2017). Kuramdan Uygulamaya STEM Eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Çepni, S. (2018). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş, (8. Baskı). Celepler Matbaacılık, Trabzon.
Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171).
Dailey, D, Bunn, G., Cotabish, A. (2015). Answering the Call to Improve STEM Education: A STEM Teacher Preparation Program. The Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification, Vol. 10, Number 2.
Davidson, A., Herbert, S. & Bragg, L.A. (2018). Supporting Elementary Teachers’ Planning and Assessing of Mathematical Reasoning. Int J of Sci and Math Educ . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9904-0
Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153
English, L. D., and King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-18.
English, L.D.(2015). STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. In Beswick, Kim, Muir, Tracey, & Wells, Jill (Eds.)Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME, Hobart, Tas, pp. 4-18.
EU Skills Panorama (2014). STEM skills Analytical Highlight, prepared by ICF and Cedefop for the European Commission). https://skillspanorama.cedefop.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUSP_AH_STEM_0.pdf
Fan, S. C., and Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129.
Fielding-Wells, J. (2013). Inquiry-based argumentation in primary mathematics: reflecting on evidence. In MERGA 36: 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 290-297). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Fischer, A., Greiff, S., and Funke, J. (2012), “The process of solving complex problems”, Journal of Problem Solving, Vol. 4/1, pp. 19-42.
Fischer, A., Greiff, S., and Funke, J. (2017). The Nature of Problem Solving, chapter:7, “The history of complex problem solving”. pp.107-121 .DOI: 10.1787/9789264273955-9-en.
Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11, 133–142.
Gonzalez, H.B. & Kuenzi J. (2012). Congressional Research Service Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Holt, D.V. et al. Education Tech Research Dev (2013) 61: 407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9301-x
Hager,P., Gonczi, A. (1996). What is competence? Medical Teacher, Vol. 18, No. 1.
Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Herde, C. N., Wüstenberg, S., and Greiff, S. (2016). Assessment of complex problem solving what we know and what we don’t know. Appl. Meas. Educ. 29, 265–277. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2016.1209208
Jolly, A. (2016). What’s So New or Different about STEM? Retrieved from https://www.stem-by-design.com/whats-so-new-or-different-about-stem/
Kelley, T.R. and Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11). Advanced online publication. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kennedy, T., and Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., and Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series. Vol. 2014, Issue 1, 1-23
McDonald, CV (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Science Education International 27(4), 530–569.
Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., and Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35–60). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Nadelson,L.S., Callahan,J., Pyke,P., Hay, A., Dance, M., and Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers, The Journal of Educational Research, 106:2, 157-168. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
National Research Council [NRC], (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., and Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM teacher education: Affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300–309
Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough?: Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 31-44.
Siekmann, G. and Korbel, P. (2016), “Defining 'STEM' skills: review and synthesis of the literature.- support document 1”, NCVER, Adelaide, available at: http://www.ncvre.edu.au.
Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education . Science Curriculum of Primary and Secondary School ( grade, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8).
Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325
Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.5703/ 1288284314636
Wells, J. G., (2016). Efficacy of the technological/engineering design approach: Imposed cognitive demands within design-based biotechnology instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 4-20
Yıldırım, A., and Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Published
2021-05-08
How to Cite
ERGÜL, Nimet Remziye. Investigation of STEM Competencies of Teacher Candidates. European Journal of Physics Education, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 38-55, may 2021. ISSN 1309-7202. Available at: <http://eu-journal.org/index.php/EJPE/article/view/296>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2023.
Section
Articles